Although many deaths, either by suffocation, bus door, or frustrated Italian, almost happened, we all arrived safely at Borghese. We had some specific targets, although the entire thing is simply spectacular. There are fantastic gardens out front, and it is another one of those old villa/castle things that is a piece of art in itself, and one of those museums that you only find in Europe where there isn't just art chilling around on display, but art literally everywhere, all over the walls and ceilings and floors. Anyway, our specific targets were, of course, Caravaggio and Bernini (no museum in this country seems to have escaped Caravaggio). The Caravaggio of interest was "Davido con la testa di Golia," "David With the Head of Goliath." This is a noteworth painting for two reasons. 1) Caravaggio painted himself as the head of Goliath. 2) The head of Goliath is one of the most gruesomely realistic things oil ever put on canvas. Seriously. We all stared at it with our mouths just kind of open for... for way too long. You know how the other day I said something really pretentious like "I find that early Caravaggios lack his characteristic flair for emotion"? This painting has it. To the max. The painting is also very interesting in relation to some stuff we've been talking about in class. I've enjoyed the parallels we've drawn from David and Goliath to Judith and Holofernes, and this David was posed a lot like a Judith and Holofernes. (Speaking of which, I told Sister Terri I would look up the 'Judith Slaying Holofernes' by the one famous female painter of the time, Artemisia Gentileschi. It's in Firenze, and shows heavy Caravaggio influence as well as heavy not being a fan of men, a big theme of Gentileschi's work.)
Also, I find the habit of painters to place themselvs as an evil character very interesting. This habit seemed to dominate Rennaissance and Baroque, which made me think as I was giving my presentation today on Biblical art of the catacombs (more on that below) that it might have something to do with the concept of Catholic guilt growing stronger and stronger through time. What I mean by this is that in early Christianity, when the followers were highly persecuted slaves and poor citizens, religious teaching and art seemed to be focused on the promise of the afterlife, which makes sense. As Chritians grew in power and did a 180 to become the most wealthy and in control people in Europe, more religious teaching and art seems to have been about the troubles of Earth, and the sin and repetance that must happen before Heaven. Even a depiction of Christ suffering was unheard of in early Christianity, yet by the 1500 and 1600's, we have painters so fascinated by the bloody and sinful aspects of Church history, and perhaps so preoccupied with their own sin, that they paint themselves as evil giants, or even Judas (as did Jacopo Bassano, whose Ultima Cena we saw, an unusual depcition of all the disciples at the last supper arguing and chaotic, with just one, thought to be both Judas and Bassano, looking out at the viewer).
(The Caravaggio. I guess you have to get up close and personal to really see how nightmareish this is. But just take my word for it. Every line in that face is Lord Sauron-level evil.)
(Bassano'sUltima Cena).
The Berninis at Borghese are all of his most famous works that aren't out in the city somewhere. I don't know how this one Museo got them all, but Dear Lord Baby Jesus. From room to room to room, visitors are relentlessly barraged by a series of statues so incredible that I would believe you if you told me that all Bernini actually did was turn Medusa on people in action. There was Roto di Prosperina, "Rape of Prosperina," Bernini's depiction of Pluto (Roman God of the Underworld) kidnapping Prosperina (Spring) to be his wife. 'Rape' in the title refers simply to kidnapping (apparently it's a word that has changed meanings). The mastery of this statue is... indescribable. How marble could possibly be a medium where Bernini could show the impact of Pluto's grasping fingers pinching her skin together and tugging at it is absolutely beyond me. I won't even begin on the realism of their expressions or hair. Or the fact that the veins and muscles are consistently realistic, detailed, and go all the way from head to foot without sticking out obnoxiously like he tried. Just look at this.
(Seriously. The knuckles. The hand veins. The contours. This looks like a black and white photo.)
After that blew our minds to the point where all you could hear from the whole group was "Oh my God. That's crazy," there was the obnoxiously titled Enea che fugga alalle fiamme di Troia salvando il padre Anchise e il figlio Ascanio, which is simply "Aeneas, Anchises, and Ascanius" when you look it up in English. Anyway, it's a scultpture of Aeneas, the founder of Roma and son of Venus, carrying his father and leading his son away from the wreckage of Troy, after the infamous Trojan horse incident. Aeneas was the soldier who shepherded the refugees of Troy all the way to Italy to found a new country, and also the grand-something of Romulus and Remus. This statue has a LOT to express. There is the anguish of all as their city falls to ruins, yet there is also the set bravery of Aeneas and the hope for the future in the child, yet also the decrepit defeat of the old man. The three generations (this is purely my extrapolation) seem to represent the old that is failing, the present that is fighting, and the future that will succeed, in a time of turbulence. It's fairly legit. There was also a really cool painting of the same scene that we found by a guy named Borocci.(Oh, that thing they're holding is their household gods, laers.)
THEN there was Bernini's 'David,' which, as we all know, gets majorly eclipsed by Michelangelo's 'David,' and I'm not totally sure why. They are both ridiculously impressive, though obviously they approached the subject different ways. I think Michelangelo's is more grandiose, but the thing that really makes a statue worthy of the admiration of the ages to me is the detail, like the veins I was gushing about, and both Davids have it. The last statue (I promise!) was Bernini's Apollo e Dafne. This statue is about the mth where Apollo thinks he's more bro than Eros, god of love, so Eros shows him who's bro by shooting Apollo and the wood nymph Daphne with his arrows of love. However, he shoots a golden arrow into Apollo, so Apollo falls in love, and a lead arrow into Daphne, so she does not reciprocate. Apollo chases after Daphne with perhaps not the best intentions and she cries out for help to her father, another god, who saves her by turning her into a laurel tree. Bernini Medusa'ed the exact moment when Daphne began becoming a tree. And this is actually ny favorite. It has all the raw emotional power of the Rape of Prosperina, but at the same time, her hair is growing into leaves and her fingernails into twigs.
Although, as I said, everything in the Museo is incredible and most of our group wandered around like idiots for our two hours saying only variations of "Wow" and "This is unbelievable," there was one more really awesome thing I'd like to highlight. The ceiling of one gallery, and I couldn't find out who painted it, was this wonderful Christian/pagan fusion scene of a Mt. Olympus/Heaven. (I know Mt. Olympus is Greek but I don't know the proper equivalent.) The whole Roman pantheon was there, even Hercules lounging on his lion, but Jupiter was crowned with stars and posed suspiciously like the classic Christian God up in heaven on a cloud looking down. Juno next to him, Queen of Heaven, oddly resembled Mary, and Apollo had a glowing halo around his head very appropriate either for the sun god or, ya know, Jesus. To top it off, flitting about the edges were figures that could either have been Christian cherubim or pagan Cupid. I wish I had a picture, but I promise you, it was a bomb enough ceiling that my neck kinda hurts.
After ALL this excitement, we had a hurried break for lunch, where I figured out that the price difference between a panini and a soft sandwhich, tramezzini, with exaclty the same thing is 3 euro, and then we had to get to our next stop because it closed at noon. I am going to have a very hard time adequately describing the sheer intensity of our next stop. We went to Catacombe di Priscilla. Our first catacombe stop (squeee!)! I didn't know quite what to expect. The Priscilla catacombs, under the old villa of a very wealthy Roman woman, are called the "Queen of Catacombs," a fitting name for several reasons. Of all 7 Christian catacombs in the city, Priscilla has the best preserved frescoes hands-down. Also, these catacombs grew to be grander than many, with large tombs for the wealthy that could even hold sarcophagi, and several really important people were buried there (the bones have almost all been removed now), like popes and martyrs, ya know. No big deal. By the way, there are both catacombe and necropoli around Roma, and they are different things. A short explanation is that a necropolis is a 'city of the dead,' which consists mostly of large tombs the size of small rooms, while a catacomb is an underground cemetary, with the majority of the bodies lying flat in dug out graves in the wall called loculi. Also, they are both underground now, but the catacombs were built that way and the necropli were on the city surface when they were built in ancient times. Also also, catacombs don't exist only in Roma, and they weren't only used by Christians, either, but for the purposes of our class we are interested in Roman Christian ones, obviously.
So our tour guide to the catacombs was... the most fitting catacomb guide ever. We rushed in just as they were closing and Sister Terri and Dominica, supported by all of our puppy dog eyes and angelic stances, managed to sweet talk the tiniest, most adorbale nun ever into letting us in. Seriously, this woman was barely up to my shoulder. So we get our tickets and turn around to file into the door down to the catacombs. They don't let anyone through without a guide, because it's really easy and pants-wettingly terrifying to get lost down there. Anyway, we file through the door without seeing anyone and turn around and then OH, MY GOD, THERE'S OUR GUIDE. Where did he come from? He's this little (unfortunately not as little as the Sister, but pretty darn little) olive-complexioned Italian who isn't very old but still insists on having matted gray hair and one of those craggy faces that seems to be lined deep with the burdens of... the nighttime moanings of catacomb ghosts, we assume. To top off the creepy mad monk image (he wasn't even a monk, but that's so what he was), the man (yeah, he never told us his name, most likely because he is a catacomb ghost) had on full long pants and a hoodie, to which he did keep the hood up the whole tour. There were also some random lawn charis around, and he was complaining that our tour was running into his reposa (I did feel really bad about that!), so he most definitely sleeps down there. We've officially decided. He sleeps down there cuddled in a tomb with Priscilla, eats his brown bag lunch chatting with Pope Celestine (or is he Pope Celestine?!?), and has his 5 AM coffee with Jesus with the Jesus in the frescoes. He is heretofore referred to as 'Ghost Guide.'
But about the catacombs, in all seriousness. They are truly incredible. Even with the bones removed for preservation now (almost all of them, because Ghost Guide seriously relished putting his flashlight under his chin and saying that there were still bodies in the sealed tombs right behind me), the sense of walking through the place that held the carefully sealed and loved and missed remains of basically an entire culture is chilling and overwhelming. One thing that really hit me was how many child loculi there are. The whole world had a high infant mortality rate from the 2nd to 5th century, but the early Christians especially (with some exception, and pre-Constantine, the catacombs stayed in use for a little after that) were the persecuted poor and the slaves, and, as we saw in some remains under churches our first week, they lived in apalling conditions. On a similar note, even the adult graves are alarmingly short, which I feel like is one of those things that isn't some kind of human evolution over 2,000 years but just a nutrition issue that the ancients had.
And then the frescoes. The biblical scenes and symbols in the catacombs are one of the best ways archaeologists have to learn about the largely illiterate, highly persecuted, and highly propaganda-ed about early Christians. The reason it is so intense to see these frescoes is because you realize you are looking at a main way that Christians taught what they believed. You are looking at the origins of Christianity when you look at those frescoes. Also, artistically, I find them quite stunning- the colors are fantastic and it's fun to watch style develop. There were lots of really amazing frescoes in Priscilla that took my breath away. Biblical scenes of the catacombs was my pre-trip research project, and the symbols I studied were EVERYWHERE, so we talked about that for a while and I got to show off, which is always nice (to summarize: adaption of symbols and drawing parallels from paganism and the Old Testament, particularly Jonah or Moses to Jesus, and focusing on the rewards of heaven were the important themes). The coolest fresco by far was one that is the oldest Madonna and Child we know of, which dates to the 2nd century. Aside from Madonna and Child, the best frescoes were in cubicula, the larger rooms that housed sarcophagi of the wealthy (in contrast to the loculi) and were once covered with frescoes. Gatherings to worship and make offerings even happened in these rooms- we were in one with an altar that is still used to this day. It became a fun yet frustrating game of trying to recreate the original appearance in my head, like the Coliseo.\
Aside from that creeping feeling of living history, the reason I call the catacombs 'intense' is the creeping feeling of... dead-ness. Whether or not there are still bodies around, I really struggle with myself about whether it is apropriate to wander through such a place rubbernecking like a... well, a tourist. In Roma there seems to be an odd combination of truly venerating the dead and kind of not caring. That may sound odd, but the thing is that Italians do such thigns as rubberneck at catacombs all the time- we haven't yet stepped into a church without stepping over marked tombs in the floor. They certainly respect the dead, but it's a different kind of respect, I suppose. It's not the removed respect I think most Americans grew up with, if that makes any sense. I'm just glad I gave up the childhood superstition of having to hold your breath as you pass a graveyard. Or I wouldn't be allowed to breathe in Roma at all.
After this visit, we had class sessions drawing Biblical connections to what we'd been touring, and learning about flowery Medieval love poems (next to "you are more beautiful than heaven," pretty much every American V-day of dinner and chocolate looks pretty lame). Then some of us set out to explore the city on our own, make pasta, make friends, and see piazzas at night. A productive and educational day in many senses of the word.